I mentioned a little while ago that I had read a couple of new books and then the other day that I had started another one (actually, I guess I just mentioned that I had gotten it, I think, but you know), so I thought I would pass on some thoughts in case you’re interested. I can’t imagine you come here for book recommendations, but I come here to write stuff that I’m thinking about, so if you end up picking up and enjoying any of this, then I would just be really happy about that.
First up is C.S. Lewis, who is always great, of course (you guys know C.S. Lewis), with An Experiment in Criticism. (Couldn’t find a good cover picture, sorry. Go here to have a look.) This book was as much of an analysis of readers and the way that people read as it was about literature. You could put it another way and say that it looks at the whole of literature the way that a lot of criticism has done in the last 50 or 60 years and includes readers and the experience of taking in literary works as part of what constitutes literature in the first place. Like a whole lot of stuff that Lewis wrote, and like a lot of good criticism and philosophy, there are parts that you want to get upset at because they make you feel intellectually lazy or challenge the way you think about something. But even the parts that you end up coming away still sort of not agreeing with 100%, you have to appreciate for making you work through something for yourself before you set it down and move on. And then the next time you read it, you realize that he could just be right after all. This is the point where I go to the bookshelf, pull this one down, type “Listen to this:” and then try to find a great quote as if I’d remembered it by heart already and just had to get it right. I know because I just did that. Basically, the whole book is quotable, but in a lecture sort of way that you have to commit yourself to taking in. I think that anyone serious about appreciating literature could get their world rocked by this book, and I’ll just leave it at that. I told my brother Scott that he should read it, and we made a deal: he’d read this (my sort of thing and not really his) if I’d read Economics in One Lesson (his sort of thing and, in a bit of poor timing of late, not really mine). I haven’t heard back from him about this, so I haven’t started in on the economics. I have a feeling it’s coming, though, since Goldman Sachs may have already actually purchased my loved ones and me without me knowing about it. In the mean time, and more happily, on to numbers two and three.
I’d heard about the Redwall series, by Brian Jacques, since an adolescent literature class in college when a guy also named Brian did a presentation on the books (and then about a million times since, like when you learn a new word and then start encountering it everywhere), but it wasn’t until recently that I actually picked up the first two, Redwall and Mossflower.


Both fun, easy books about woodland creatures that do brave deeds and get into mischief and risk life and limb for each other in a medieval sort of setting. In the age of Harry Potter, a long children’s book with difficult things like vengeance vs. mercy or central characters dying is no big deal, and that fact sort of got in my way when I read these. The reason is that in the Redwall books—the first two, at least—when, for example, a chapter started out with two characters trying to accomplish a Thing, the chapter almost always ended with the two accomplishing the Thing, whatever it was. Or when the Good army went to pull off a sneaky maneuver on the Bad army, it worked, and generally without complication. There were rarely setbacks and never betrayals, and the characters were fun, but they didn’t keep me awake after I put the book down. And I couldn’t help but think that it was a little unfair. These books were good books, and if some day I read them to Greta or read them at the same time as Greta when she’s 9 or 10, we’ll have a blast together. Again, they’re good books. And we can’t expect everyone to make the transition from children’s books to books that used to be for children but aren’t anymore the way the Harry Potter series did. You have to accept a series for what it is, and for that, Redwall is a creative, readable set of books that, bottom line, won’t be a waste of your time.
I was going to put my number four in here at the end, but as it turns out, I just pulled out that part and pasted it to Notepad so I can finish it later. I’ve actually enjoyed number four and been challenged by it so much that I have too much to say. So rather than make this post overly long and out of balance (as opposed to just out of balance, which I’m accomplishing right now), I’ll call it a day and reflect a little more on our last book, which is nerdy and mathy and should be handled on its own anyway. Adieu, and stay tuned.